Thank you, Secretary Xi Jinping

Dear Secretary Xi,

Please accept my country’s gratitude and congratulations as you embark on your third term as General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Though it may not be obvious now, we believe that your reign will one day be recognized as one of the great unexpected blessings in the history of United States and other free nations.

With a few exceptions, this was not what was generally expected when you first became the top leader 10 years ago. Back then, many in the West had believed that it was only a matter of time before China was restored to its ancient place as the world’s dominant civilization and largest economy. China’s astonishing annual growth rate, often exceed 10%, put our own meager economic progress in the shade. In one industry after another – telecommunications, banking, social media, real estate, Chinese companies were becoming industry leaders. Foreign citizens flocked to live, study and work in Shanghai, Hong Kong and Beijing; wealthy American parents boasted of enrolling their children in Mandarin immersion classes.

At the policymaking level, there was widespread acceptance that a richer China would have greater influence overseas – and the influence would be felt from Western Europe to South America to Central Asia to East Africa. While we know this influence could be heavy-handed at times, there was little political will to curb it. China seemed to offer a unique model of capitalist dynamism and authoritarian efficacy. Once a decision was made, things could be done. What a contrast with the increasingly sclerotic free world.

Not that we thought all was fine with China. Your rise coincided with the dramatic downfall of your main rival, Bo Xilai, amid rumors of a possible coup. Longer-term challenges — widespread corruption, an aging population, the role of the state in the economy — required prudent management. So did the international resentments and resistance that swiftly rising global powers invariably engender.

However, you seemed to be up to the job. Your family’s bitter experiences during the Cultural Revolution showed that you understood the dangers of totalitarianism. Your determination to crack down on corruption seemed matched by your willingness to further liberalize the economy – demonstrated by your appointment of the competent technocrat Li Keqiang as prime minister. In the 1980s, you lived with a family in Iowa, which raised hopes that you might harbor some fondness for America.

Those hopes have not just been disappointed, they have been crushed. If there’s now a single point of agreement between Donald Trump and Joe Biden — or Tom Cotton and Nancy Pelosi, it’s that you have to be stopped.

How did you do it?

Your war on corruption has turned into a mass purge. Your repression in Xinjiang rivals the Soviet Gulags. Your economic “reforms” amount to the return of typically inefficient state-owned enterprises as dominant players.

Your de facto policy of snooping, hacking and intellectual property theft has made Chinese brands like Huawei radioactive in much of the West. In 2020, FBI Director Christopher Wray noted in a speech, “We have now reached the point where the FBI is opening a new China-related counterintelligence case every 10 hours.” Your “Zero-Covid” policy has at times turned China’s great metropolises into huge and unlivable prison colonies. Your foreign policy bullying has mainly succeeded in encouraging Japan to rearm and Biden to pledge that America will fight for Taiwan. All of this can make your China fearsome. But none of it makes you strong. Dictatorships can usually exact obedience, but they struggle to inspire loyalty. The power to coerce, as the political scientist Joseph Nye famously observed, is not the same as the power of attraction. It’s a truism that may soon come to haunt you — much as it now haunts Vladimir Putin as his once-fearsome military is decimated in Ukraine. You could still change course. But it seems unlikely, and not just because old people rarely change. The more enemies you make, the more repression you need. Surrounding yourself with yes men, as you are now doing, may provide you with a sense of security. But it will cut you off from vital flows of truthful information, especially when that information is unpleasant. The Achilles’ heel of regimes like yours is that the lies they tell their people to maintain power ultimately become lies they tell themselves. Kicking foreign journalists out of China makes the problem worse, because you no longer have the benefit of an outside view of your compounding troubles. None of this will solve our problems in US. In many ways, your truculence exacerbates these problems, not least in the increasing risk that we may someday come to blows. But in the long-running competition between the free and unfree world, you are unwittingly helping make the case for the free. To adapt a line from my colleague Tom Friedman, “Does anyone want to be your China even for a day?” I doubt it. So we want to say thank you. We know our Union is faulty; we know our leaders are flawed; we know that our society’s edges are frayed. To take one hard look at you is to prefer all this to your dismal alternative.