Reviewing Miles Guo’s Winning of Eastern VS Strategic” Case “

During the proceedings of the 5 years lawsuit against PAX, Miles filed his first Chapter 11 bankruptcy on February 17th this year. Lately, the scheduled court hearing on Aug 24th was canceled by Connecticut Bankruptcy Court without notice.

Though experiencing certain injustice in the Court, Miles has always shown his confidence in the judicial system of the U.S. In the current Chapter 11 case, the appointed Trustee Luc A. Despins and his counsel Paul Hastings issued a series of motions; in one of the motions, Despins cited a previous case of Eastern Profit Corporation Limited (“Eastern”) vs Strategic Vision US LLC (“Strategic”) as evidence to show that Miles is the real holder of certain entities that act as a shell company.

As was reported, the Eastern vs Strategic case lasted for three years and was Miles’ first win in a lawsuit against non-Chinese citizens in the U.S., when the defendants are backed by the Chinese Communist Party through sponsorship from Bruno Wu, a CCP’s top agent, and the assistance of Elliott Broidy, Washington’s lobbyist.

On June 22, 2021, the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York issued court documents on the findings of fact and conclusion of law for the case of Eastern vs Strategic.

Judge Lewis J. Liman concluded that Eastern won the claim that the disputed “Agreement” was void and unenforceable, and Eastern was entitled to take back the US$1 million illegally received by Strategic; and Miles is a dissident against the CCP, which is the supporter behind Strategic, that has published articles slandering Miles.

Eastern stated that Strategic undertook work that fell within the scope of Virginia’s Private Security Services Statute, but failed to secure the requisite license, nevertheless, the defendants went ahead and signed a service contract of $9 million for a term of 3 years, including an upfront payment of $100M. Later, due to Strategic not delivering any of the monthly reports. On February 23, 2018, Eastern delivered a letter to Strategic terminating the Agreement.

During the lawsuit proceedings, Strategic argued that Miles was falsely declaring his identity. Wallop and Waller testified that they entered into the agreement with Miles because they believed that Miles was anti-CCP, but later they learned that he (Miles) was affiliated with the CCP. The judge said Strategic made such a request after receiving funds for a lawsuit from an alleged opponent of Miles, who was interested in undermining Miles’ arguments against China, namely Elliott Broidy, a wealthy American businessman, whose credibility was also questionable. The judge concluded that Strategic failed to prove that Miles made a false statement.

In a June 23 live broadcast, Miles commented on the significance of winning; as case law, the case will set the stage for the future of the whistleblower Movement, otherwise, if he loses, he and all of the fellow fighters of the Whistleblower Movement will be regarded as agents of the CCP.