Miles Guo explains the difference between CCP law and U.S. law

In the live broadcast on August 5th, Miles Guo compared the detailed differences between the CCP and US laws, and repeatedly reminded his comrades-in-arms that they must have absolute respect for the law, especially judges, and maintain their own morality, and must not be arrogant in court.

Miles Guo first pointed out that the laws of any country are a tool for those in power to constrain the power of the general public and impose obligations on the people. Obligation means that people must obey the existing legal system unconditionally. When ordinary people want to challenge those in power, the highest priority is to abide by the law, the courts and judges, to preserve their own strength, and to appeal their rights and interests through the law, rather than to attack law enforcement personnel at the end of the system, or even use violence, because they feel unjustly treated.

Miles Guo further pointed out that although the CCP and the United States have laws, the CCP’s legal system is completely different, and when the people want to challenge the CCP to protect their rights and interests, the CCP will never give people the opportunity to appeal successfully, because the CCP’s legal system lacks judicial aid, power oversight, and third-party oversight of procedural justice. In the US legal system, if anyone who respects the obligation to make a legal decision, he or she also has the right to appeal. Even after many bad trial results, if the key evidence is in hand and the argument is put forward, the law will give the most consistent judgment in the end.

In conclusion, Miles Guo particularly stressed that the most important thing in the face of the law is to have law-abiding ethics. When a judgment against oneself occurs, one should be calm, while absolutely respecting the judge and enforcement of the court’s judgment. Only then referring to the lawyer’s professional opinions and suggestions; distinguishing between their obligations, and rights must be fought for in accordance with the law.